"Come on, machine, no more. Nobody stops you”
Thursday night almost kills us. Almost breaks a consensus achieved after horror, in '83. They tried to murder Cristina Kirchner. Literally a guy bragged inches from his face. I tried not to play the video several times, because I wanted to avoid imagining a tragic and tarantinesque scene. There are people who believe everything was armed, but the only gun was Sabag Montiel. Many insult him because he failed. Looks like if they don't kill, it's not worth it. In front of this cynicism, I remember Shinzo Abe. He didn't have the same luck.
The dictatorships, political violence and the destinies of countries are a reflection of what people tolerate. Last Friday, people went out mass to the street to say one not labeling fascism. No circus, no show was popular. And how many stayed in offside! The limit was established, and whatever any dead political leader who goes to the history books, we have several.
Couldn't the leaders of this country take a day to unify a speech that represents those we want to live in freedom in this country? It seems that there is not so much time to get away from the partisan calculations. Everyone was unsuccessful.
Intervention to the statue of Lisandro of the Tower, murdered politician.
The dialectics of political speculation
As a citizen, I feel in Alaska without shelter. It is that, several referents and employees, did not honor their role or position. For them, Thursday wasn't enough. It was not to decree a holiday, nor to march out, not much less to condemn the fact in the instant. Mauricio Macri took 24 hours to repudiate. What calculation did you do? Patricia Bullrich neither. She preferred to revive roughnesses: " The president is playing with fire: instead of seriously investigating a fact of gravity, accuses the opposition and the press, and decrees a holiday to mobilize militants. Converts an act of individual violence into a political move. It's unfortunate. ”
What do we do with presidential candidates who do not respect democracy and who at this time have dubious human qualities? Mrs. Bullrich demonstrated her little republican vocation. She calls him “firmity”. But it is difficult to imagine that Argentina is going forward if it condemns violence is synonymous with weakness. If this is not worth it, then violence is valid.
Some Members have also had importance to what happened. Cristian Ritondo, in turn, said the holiday was a party measure. “At my time, the boys were going to reflect to the classrooms. Now, in any doubt, the government closes the schools”, twitteó. Ritondo was born in 1966. In dictatorship. When he was ten, there was dictatorship. In his adolescence, there was dictatorship. When he went to college, they killed you for reflecting. Perhaps that is why they did not explain that when the fucking democracy is called into question, for which many died, it is not a barbarity to decree a holiday to enable the reflection and mobilization of all affected.
These people speculated throughout Friday night about whether or not to go down to the enclosure, the special session called to condemn the attempted murder. And they took hostage other sectors within Together for Change. Thus let him transcend Juan Manuel Lopez of the Civic Coalition, when he stated that "Patricia Bullrich is a generation for which violence was an option and I regret it".
As if that were little, Amalia Granata doubted the truthfulness of the facts and even threatened to tell "chanchurrios" of politicians and talking about their lovers bothered her.
In turn, Javier Milei, after repudiating the attack very strongly in Congress, continued with his usual fascist show. " But of course, when you touch one here, the caste appear there the hypocrites, the solidarity... the only thing you care about is taking care of your privileges”He said.
As frutilla of dessert, the libertarian and Cecilia Moreau discussed the conclusion of the word President, starring a bochorno and a burla for all the inhabitants of this country, which ended with the deputy shouting "casta" to them all, while moving away from the enclosure.
Hate speeches
Another subject under discussion from the attack is the origin of hatred. The center of the question is itself Sabag Montiel was a “loquito” or if it is the product of the messages of disqualifiers disclosed by politicians and referents.
Certainly be a bit of both. I think it is time to see that 90% of annual inflation also has it in polarization. For years, we have naturalized the disqualifying speeches of various political sectors. You don't have to go too far to see him. Just last week, Cristina Kirchner said rubber to Patricia Bullrich, who called her crying. At the same time, Maximus Kirchner stated that the opposition seeks a dead peronist. Not to stand back, Milei said the “zurdos” and the K did not banish themselves. And I could follow.
Many journalists also broadcast hate, disqualify, complicit kidneys, lie and hide. I realized that this influences viewers, listeners and readers. As long as a professional exercise of communication should avoid condemning without evidence, interview those who like and limit the agenda to those who hate. Because your job is to honestly inform... and it costs to find spaces where that happens.
But besides, I'm tired of hearing that the means manipulate. You know what? They don't. The hypodermic needle theory, where the audience is silly and cannot reflect on itself, has been rejected for decades. Humans are more complex than that and pay more attention to our environment than to journalists.
That being said, everyone has an identity, and seeks to reconfirm it on the channels, diais that tunes. In their cultural consumptions in general. That is why the task of communicators plays an important role, because they reinforce thoughts with arguments. In this sense, those who are publicly exposed and are referring to many, should take this into account when publishing, and not end up with the same interviewees once and again.
That doesn't solve with an anti-hate law, but something has to do. You can't pretend dementia and take chlorine dioxide on open television to make you the rebel, as if it had no impact. Perhaps, I would have to start with a law of public policy with clear rules.
In short, we can say that there is at least a very toxic context. Public referents take off with everything and expect “the other” to be the one that matures first. Guys, someone has to start.
Comments