The company Estancias La Florencia S.A. denounces a series of decisions that, far from responding to technical or legal criteria, would have been directly driven by the governor's office, affecting rights over private lands with properly established titles.
An imposed reserve on private property
The core of the conflict is the compulsive declaration of "Natural Reserve of Multiple Uses" over the company's lands. They claim that this measure would have been applied against the provisions established by the provincial law of protected natural areas, without respecting the corresponding procedures or the private nature of the land.
As already reflected by local media such as El Comercial and La Mañana, the area has been the subject of disputes, but the current case escalates due to the level of political intervention reported.
Expropriations on the agenda and aligned pressure
In parallel, MOCAFOR has pushed for expropriation requests over the same lands. The company asserts that there is alignment between these claims and decisions from the provincial government, which reinforces the perception of a coordinated advance on private property.
Perfect titles, taxes up to date
Estancias La Florencia emphasizes that these are lands with valid property titles and all tax obligations fulfilled, dismissing any irregularities that could justify such state intervention.
Survey halted by political decision
The most critical point of the conflict is the management of the surveying process:
• The provincial administration canceled the original process.
• It was required to be redone from scratch.
• After being presented again, the survey was approved.
• However, the approval was reversed at the last moment.
According to the company, this reversal had no technical justification, but was a direct political decision.
They even claim that in informal conversations, officials acknowledged that the order to halt the survey came from the governor Insfrán himself.
A witness case about political power and property
The conflict exposes a sensitive point: to what extent can political power intervene over private assets without respecting current legal frameworks.
In a context where productive development, job creation, and investment inflows are discussed, the case of Estancias La Florencia raises a troubling signal: the possibility that discretionary decisions from the provincial executive power prevail over the law.
More than an isolated conflict, it is a case that directly challenges the institutional model of the province and the role of the State concerning private property.
Comments