After 40 years of democracy, we arrived in the 21st century without a ruling class at the height of the circumstances that the country goes through.How can it be, that after we counted on our having with pro-ceres and statesmen, who marked the course of many nations and put Argentina among the most developed countries, today we are without drivers who can take the country forward?
When did you lose the gift of leading in our country?
Based on my reflections, I came to the conclusion that, from the Pro campaigns, the way of making politics has changed.Clearly, the founding members of this political party, mostly, come from middle and high social sectors. For this reason, to understand that these groups are the circumstances that affect them, they are afflicted and known.However, reaching the large mass of voters of the lower classes meant a real challenge. Seeking empathy with a group that does not belong and in which, often, relations were of mutual rejection.At this point is where the magic of consultant Duran Barba, who used, among other tools to the famous focus groups to understand how this “other people” thought and how “llegarles” power, both in the way of communicating and in the content of communication.It is undeniable that the procedure was extremely successful in terms of political results. This strategy led Pro to direct the destinations of the City of Buenos Aires for more than 20 years, has led an alliance with the traditional Radical Party, to reach the presidency of the nation in 2015 and to maintain legislative and executive presence in many of the provinces of the country.Now, it's not all gold that relucts.Under the success that represented bringing the leaders closer to those directed by means of analysis and technology tools on social networks, public management, that is, the exercise of power, entered a minute-by-minute mode, as was a television or radio program, in which leaders are pending the impact they have their and actions to modify them on the march if they receive some kind of rejection or approach.Currently, all political proposals work with this model, to detect what people want, rather than to analyze what society and the country need.This new form of leadership is ending with the leaders, because currently those who drive do so depending on what most people opin, donating an exclusive role for strategists and statesmen.True leaders project their thoughts and decisions on their followers showing signs and paths to where to go.Instead, the pseudo-leaders who base their management in the opinion of the led are just a reflection of the group that runs.Governing is defining a model to follow and order the governed to achieve the goals to achieve it.Being boss, leader or leader is a task reserved for very few. Empathizing with those who are directed is fundamental, however, it is very different to design that reflect, because in the first case, the proposals arise from an elaboration whose coherence part of the criterion unit, while in the second come from the interpretation of what others say they want or think.These elections highlighted both leadership models, on the one hand those who put the horse ahead of the car and on the other, those who invested the order.The result of the Steps demonstrated that citizenship in a conscious or unconscious way voted in search of the natural order, i.e., privileged the proposals more than the expressions of empathy.Is there a real leader within the electoral proposals?Do you want to validate this article?
By validating, you are certifying that the published information is correct, helping us fight against misinformation.
horacio gustavo ammaturo
I am Gustavo Ammaturo. I have a degree in Economics. CEO and Director of infrastructure, energy and telecommunications companies. Founder and mentor of Fintech, DeFi and software development companies. Blockchain Product Designer.
Comments