There are elections that change governments and others that change the political climate of a country. The one held on Sunday in Saxony-Anhalt belongs to the second category. Alternative for Germany (AfD) obtained 43.8% of the votes, 20 points more than in 2021, and was only three seats away from an absolute majority. The CDU of Chancellor Friedrich Merz, which has governed the state since 2002, fell to 17.2%, about half of its previous support. Voter turnout reached 76.5%, a particularly revealing figure: the AfD did not only receive votes from other parties, but managed to bring citizens who usually do not participate to the polls.
The result constitutes the greatest electoral victory of the German radical right since World War II. But its importance does not only lie in the magnitude of the percentage. For the first time, an extreme right party finds itself genuinely at the gates of governing a German federal state. The cordon sanitaire that has kept the AfD out of executive power for years remains in effect, but its political effectiveness has been seriously questioned. The question is no longer whether the party can win elections. It has proven it can. The question is whether the other parties will be able to continue preventing a force that concentrates almost half of the votes from governing.
The electoral analysis document prepared before the elections already warned that the result should be understood as the convergence of several factors: discontent with the federal government, the weakening of the CDU, concerns about immigration, structural economic problems in the former East Germany, and a campaign aimed at presenting the AfD as a governing alternative and not just as a protest force.
A referendum on Merz
The election was regional, but it ended up functioning as a referendum on Berlin. Friedrich Merz intended to recover for the CDU part of the electorate that had emigrated to the AfD through a harsher conservative discourse. The result suggests that the strategy has failed, at least in Saxony-Anhalt. Voters who considered the CDU insufficiently conservative found a more robust alternative, while those who might have supported the center-right were not necessarily attracted by its hardening.
Siegmund did not hide the national dimension of the election. After learning the results, he stated that the victory constituted a signal for Berlin. Even more revealing was his comment during the campaign: Merz himself had been, in his opinion, one of the best propagandists for the AfD. The unpopularity of the chancellor was exceptionally high in the state; according to a recent survey, only 9% of voters expressed satisfaction with his policies.
Thus, the AfD managed to transform an election about roads, schools, employment, or regional administration into a judgment about the direction of Germany. The local vote acquired a national dimension and allowed a much broader discontent to channel into a single ballot.
The territory where progress takes time to arrive
Saxony-Anhalt offers particularly fertile ground for that strategy. Reunification deeply transformed the territory, but it did not eliminate the differences in income, productivity, industrial structure, and job opportunities with the western states. More than absolute poverty, there is a persistent perception of relative backwardness and that German prosperity is distributed unevenly.
Recent data helps understand that feeling. In 2025, the state’s GDP fell by 0.2% in real terms, compared to growth of 0.2% across Germany. The decline was especially significant in the manufacturing industry, with a real drop of 1.8%.
The labor market also does not help build a sense of security. In August 2026, the unemployment rate reached 8.2%, compared to the national 6.5%, and 90,709 people were registered as unemployed. The Federal Employment Agency itself warned of the cyclical weakness and noted that workers of foreign origin increasingly contribute to compensating for the demographic decline.
Inflation is another component of daily frustration. In August, prices increased by 3.2% year-on-year, following a 2.7% rise in July, with a particularly strong increase in energy, whose prices rose by 11.7%. Retail trade also recorded a real decline of 2.4% in the first half of 2026.
And relative poverty continues to be considerably higher than the national average. In 2025, 21.3% of residents were at risk of poverty, and 24.1% were exposed to the risk of poverty or social exclusion, compared to 21.2% in Germany.
Overlaying this economic landscape is a particular political memory. A segment of the population in the former East Germany retains the feeling that reunification meant joining a system designed from the West. The AfD has turned this memory into a political tool: it speaks of abandonment, of elites distanced from the provinces, and of an East Germany that has paid an excessive price for transformations decided in Berlin.
The Siegmund effect
In this context appears Ulrich Siegmund, 35 years old, a politician very different from the traditional image of the far-right leader. Born in Havelberg in 1990, he studied economic psychology and business administration, worked in the private sector, and has been a regional deputy since 2016.
His main electoral asset is not so much the radicalness of his positions as his ability to make them digestible. Siegmund speaks in a friendly tone, uses everyday language, and deliberately cultivates an image of a politician close to citizens. During the campaign, he even resorted to symbols of East Germany, including the popular Simson scooters, to build an emotional connection with an electorate that feels little represented by national elites.
The strategy contains a fundamental paradox. Siegmund has moderated the form of communication of the AfD much more than its essential content. His campaign projected a friendly, rational, and pragmatic organization, but the program maintains radical positions on immigration, energy, education, and foreign policy. ZDF summed up this contradiction by pointing out that Siegmund's tone was friendly while the program approved by the organization preserved deeply radical proposals.
His program contemplates immediate deportations of persons without legal residency, additional centers for expulsions, separate classes for certain children of refugees, and mandatory work programs for asylum seekers. It also proposes reducing the weight of public broadcasting, eliminating certain political funding programs, and deeply modifying energy policy.
In energy, the AfD proposes halting the expansion of wind energy, ending certain subsidies for renewables, and recovering energy ties with Russia, including the reopening of Nord Stream. In tax matters, it promises to reduce taxes and bureaucracy and limit the growth of the state.
Immigration continues to be, however, the core identity of the project. The AfD advocates a policy of strong restriction on entry, deportations, and "remigration." The party also questions climate policy, opposes much of gender policy, and maintains a position favoring re-establishing closer relations with Russia.
From protest to adherence
Perhaps the most important key to the result lies in what happened outside traditional circuits of vote transfer. The AfD not only received former CDU voters. A substantial part of its growth came from former abstainers. The extraordinarily high participation turned latent discontent into effective participation.
This phenomenon explains why it would be insufficient to interpret the result as a passing protest. The AfD managed to bring together three electorates that until now had behaved differently: those who wanted to punish the government, those who share its nationalist and anti-immigration ideology, and those who, without necessarily identifying with the entire program, believe that the party offers a more effective alternative than weakened traditional formations.
The transformation is politically decisive. A protest party needs an adversary to vote against. A party that becomes an alternative needs to convince the voter that it can govern. In Saxony-Anhalt, the AfD has taken an important step toward that second condition.
A signal that crosses Germany
The victory does not guarantee that Siegmund will head the regional government. The AfD has 39 of the 83 seats and needs support. The BSW, with five deputies, could be decisive, although the traditional parties formally maintain their rejection of any coalition with the far right.
But even if Siegmund does not manage to govern, the political effect has already occurred. The psychological barrier has been broken. The electorate has demonstrated its willingness to hand over almost half of the votes of a federal state to an organization that for decades has been confined to the margins of the political system. The very electoral analysis of the reference document concludes that the AfD's problem has ceased to be exclusively electoral and has become a governability problem for Germany.
The European laboratory
The repercussions of Saxony-Anhalt may be greater beyond its borders. The lesson that Marine Le Pen in France, Giorgia Meloni and Roberto Vannacci in Italy, Nigel Farage in the UK, or Vox in Spain will observe is not only that discontent favors the far right. It will be that a radical organization can expand its electorate when it manages to present a more conventional face without abandoning the positions that constitute its identity.
This is probably the most exportable element of Siegmund's experience: moderating the character, not necessarily the program; transforming an election about concrete issues into a plebiscite on national government; and converting abstainers into an electoral reserve.
The German result does not allow us to affirm that the far right will inevitably win the next European elections. Italy shows that it can reach power and stabilize, while the Netherlands shows that it can also fail in government. France, with Marine Le Pen at the forefront of the polls, will probably be the decisive test. But Saxony-Anhalt has provided European radical parties with something more valuable than a victory: a method.
The AfD has discovered that it can stop asking the voter to protest and start asking them to trust. That difference, much deeper than an electoral percentage, is the real news that came on Sunday from Magdeburg.
Comments