26/07/2025 - politica-e-sociedade

Agentes Federais Sob Ataque: A Realidade Por Trás do Escudo

Por Miami Strategic Intelligence Institute

Agentes Federais Sob Ataque: A Realidade Por Trás do Escudo

Jesus Daniel Romero from MCI2 for Poder & Dinero and FinGurú

In the chaos of summer 2025, federal agents deployed in Los Angeles faced what many described as a "Gladiator School," a term used internally by officials to describe the intensity and unpredictability of violent protest zones. Yet amid the turmoil, these agents maintained a level of discipline and restraint rarely acknowledged by the media.

The deployed agents were not typical riot control forces. Many came from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Customs and Border Protection (CBP), and various federal task forces. They were trained for border interdictions, federal warrant operations, and national security missions—not for crowd control in hostile urban terrain. However, between June and August 2025, they found themselves besieged in downtown Los Angeles.

There were real injuries. Agents suffered concussions, burns, and traumas from improvised blunt weapons. According to the DHS, on June 7, 2025, over 1,000 rioters surrounded an ICE facility in Los Angeles, slashed tires, vandalized buildings, and assaulted officers, representing a 413% increase in attacks against ICE personnel compared to previous periods (Department of Homeland Security, 2025a). Agents were hit with bricks, Molotov cocktails, lasers, and frozen water bottles, resulting in multiple hospitalizations.

Among the lesser-reported injuries were dozens of cases of agents suffering eye lacerations, embedded broken glass, and torn corneas from shattered bottles and projectiles thrown at close range. At least four agents required emergency eye surgery, according to internally reviewed medical records. Despite this, the federal teams continued to operate under strict engagement rules, refraining from the use of lethal force even as the attacks escalated. This level of restraint, despite sustained harassment, highlights the professionalism and discipline that federal agents maintained during the prolonged urban confrontations.

Fortunately, the federal government has made it clear that there will be severe consequences for those who assault federal agents in the line of duty. But, like modern gladiators, many of these officers were thrown into a chaotic urban arena they did not choose, fulfilling legal orders under conditions for which they were never specifically trained. These agents, primarily specialized in border interdictions, drug enforcement operations, and national security missions, were not experts in riot control. However, they found themselves directly targeted by protesters whose intention was not peaceful dissent but to cause physical harm and chaos. The disconnect between their training and the environment they faced underscores both the volatility of those confrontations and the remarkable restraint they exhibited in their response.

In some cases, left-wing agitators went so far as to attempt to identify federal agents by name and residential address, and to share this personal information on encrypted platforms. The intent was clearly alarming: to allow operatives to attack them and their families outside the protest zones. This level of harassment and intimidation represents a shift from spontaneous riots to deliberate and asymmetric harassment campaigns, aimed not only at federal operations but at the officials themselves who are tasked with carrying them out.

At least 17 vehicles owned by the federal government, including ICE SUVs and Border Patrol units, were damaged or destroyed in targeted attacks. Internal DHS records from June and July confirm these figures, corroborated in oversight sessions (Department of Homeland Security, 2025a). Despite the intensity of these confrontations, federal agents did not respond with lethal force.

That fact is important.

Not a single protester died from federal crossfire during the riots in Los Angeles. The use of force remained at non-lethal levels, focused on dispersal and deterrence. Agents used tear gas, pepper spray, and stun devices. The legal thresholds for escalation were repeatedly met, but lethal options were avoided.

A senior DHS official, who requested anonymity, told us:

“This was not Portland in 2020. The threats were real, and our agents were bleeding. But the restraint we demonstrated was not just discipline. It was a decision and a duty to protect lives on both sides.”

 

Some of the images captured during the events evoked the dystopian tone of the movie Escape from L.A., but this was not fiction. These were real streets, real lives, and real threats. Protesting is a constitutional right. Violence is not. However, when interviewed, many of the detained rioters admitted that they did not know that federal agents have constitutionally protected authority to defend federal facilities and personnel, regardless of local authorities' sentiments.

The destruction of federal property, attacks on law enforcement, and the use of encrypted communications have become standard tactics of extremist cells operating from within protests that appear peaceful. Federal agents are not exempt from scrutiny, but when they enforce the law with discipline and restraint under extreme pressure, that should be recognized.

What occurred in Los Angeles was not simply civil unrest. It was a deliberate attempt to confront and undermine law enforcement. The agents deployed on the ground responded with professionalism and determination. The federalized military forces that participated in support roles also maintained a disciplined and professional posture throughout the crisis.

This was not an act of protest. It was an organized campaign to provoke destruction and generate violence.

During the summer of 2025, reports circulated indicating that recruitment advertisements had appeared on platforms like Craigslist, offering significant compensation to individuals with prior military experience—explicitly excluding ex-marines—to join organized protests. Although it was confirmed that the most widely circulated advertisement was a joke, the attention it received reflects how easily these tactics can spread and influence real-world events (MSN, 2023).

Beyond that, open-source investigations and political analysts have expressed concern about the Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL) and its ideological alignment with foreign actors, including openly hostile regimes to the United States (Party for Socialism and Liberation, n.d.). These protest movements increasingly resemble asymmetric operations, recruiting operatives with specific skills and coordinating through encrypted platforms. This strategy reflects tactics used by criminal organizations such as the Los Zetas cartel, which recruited famous ex-elite soldiers to strengthen its armed wing (ICE, 2021).

Historically, radical groups such as the Black Panther Party and the Black Liberation Army followed similar paths in the 1960s and 1970s, though without promises of financial reward (Burrough, 2015, p. 15). Today, a new version of that formula has emerged, driven by digital reach, economic incentives, and patterns of foreign influence that have yet to be fully explored (Chang et al., 2023).

Throughout history, urban guerrilla tactics have not only been used by foreign enemies or criminal cartels but also by ideological factions aligned with internal political agendas. In recent years, elements of the radical left have functioned as militant pressure arms of large political coalitions. These groups tend to resurge in times of electoral tension, setbacks in public policy, or institutional scandals. Their mobilization is not casual. It is strategic.

The pardon granted to Oscar López Rivera in 2017, a convicted member of the terrorist group FALN responsible for over 130 bomb attacks in the United States, is a telling example. His release, approved by President Obama just days before leaving office, was interpreted by many as a political gesture aimed at energizing a specific electoral bloc (Meese & Kirsanow, 2017). The precedent it set is concerning: individuals linked to violent extremist movements can be portrayed as activists if the political moment and partisan benefit justify it.

The ideological roots of today's urban agitation often trace back to revolutionary movements from the Cold War era. They were not marginal student experiments but structured alliances with regimes hostile to the United States. Karen Bass, the current mayor of Los Angeles, has acknowledged her participation in the Venceremos Brigade—a pro-Castro program that brought young Americans to Cuba during the 1970s—and has stated that she visited the island at least eight times in her youth (Dovere, 2020).

According to reports from The Atlantic, the FBI tracked the Brigade's links to Cuban intelligence services and noted that some participants received limited military training. Although Bass insists she never received military instruction nor carried weapons, she admitted to joining the program out of solidarity, despite being aware that Cubans did not enjoy the same freedoms as Americans (Dovere, 2020). That experience, and the ideological formation it implied, is relevant in evaluating institutional responses to orchestrated antigovernment violence.

References

Department of Homeland Security (2025a, June 7). Statement on violent rioters assaulting ICE agents in Los Angeles, CA. https://www.dhs.gov/news/2025/06/07/dhs-releases-statement-violent-rioters-assaulting-ice-officers-los-angeles-ca-and

Burrough, B. (2015). Days of rage: America's radical underground, the FBI, and the forgotten age of revolutionary violence (p. 15). Penguin. https://books.google.com/books?id=QPUVBAAAQBAJ&pg=PT15

Chang, J., Burke, M., & Awan, I. (2023). Coordinated digital protest destabilization and foreign actor influence. Journal of Global Security Studies, 9(1). https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10106894

ICE. (2021, May 27). Associate of the Los Zetas cartel who became a plaza boss in northern Mexico sentenced in San Antonio. https://www.ice.gov/news/releases/los-zetas-cartel-assassin-who-became-northern-mexico-plaza-boss-sentenced-san-antonio

MSN. (2023, September 20). Fact Focus: A Craigslist ad is not proof of paid protesters in LA. It was posted as a prank. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/fact-focus-a-craigslist-ad-is-not-proof-of-paid-protesters-in-la-it-was-posted-as-a-prank/ar-AA1Gsxox

Party for Socialism and Liberation. (n.d.). Official website. https://pslweb.org

Meese, E., & Kirsanow, P. (2017, January 18). President Obama's pardon of Oscar López Rivera trades a terrorist for votes. The Heritage Foundation. https://www.heritage.org/crime-and-justice/commentary/president-obamas-pardon-oscar-lopez-rivera-trades-terrorist-votes

Dovere, E.-I. (2020, July 31). When Karen Bass worked in Castro's Cuba. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2020/07/karen-bass-cuba-venceremos-brigade/614662/

Jesus Daniel Romero is a retired Commander of Naval Intelligence of the United States, for which he also performed prominent diplomatic activities. He led inter-agency teams in drug trafficking investigations and suppression in Latin America.

He is Co-Founder and Senior Fellow at Miami Strategic Intelligence Institute, author of the Amazon bestseller "The final flight: The Queen of air" and is currently writing a trilogy of books on transnational crime in Latin America.

Columnist for the Diario Las Américas in Miami, Florida, and a permanent consultant for media on issues in his field of expertise.

"

"

Deseja validar este artigo?

Ao validar, você está certificando que a informação publicada está correta, nos ajudando a combater a desinformação.

Validado por 0 usuários
Miami Strategic Intelligence Institute

Miami Strategic Intelligence Institute

O Instituto de Inteligência Estratégica de Miami LLC (MSI²) é um think tank conservador, independente e privado, especializado em análise geopolítica, pesquisa de políticas, inteligência estratégica, treinamento e consultoria. Promovemos a estabilidade, a liberdade e a prosperidade na América Latina, ao mesmo tempo em que enfrentamos o desafio global apresentado pela República Popular da China (RPC) e pelo Partido Comunista Chinês (PCCh).
https://miastrategicintel.com/

TwitterLinkedinYoutubeInstagram

Visualizações: 9

Comentários

Podemos te ajudar?